Arroyo forgets the fourth “E” in her SONA

Well, almost.

In her supposedly last State of the Nation (SONA) address yesterday before Congress, President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo talked mainly in glowing terms, about her administration’s achievements since she first came into office in 2001.

Yes, the GDP grew from $86 billion in 2001 to $187 billion as of last year, and we have had 33 quarters of uninterrupted growth. The figures are cast in stone, so it is almost impossible to dispute these. What is not mentioned though is that the GDP number for instance is puny compared to our neighbors’ and it does not tell anything about the distribution of wealth. Our growth rates are tepid at best compared to the sizzle at some of our neighboring countries.

The achievement, she says, were accomplished due to her administration’s focus on three E’s—economy, education and environment—which are considered pillars of the economic progress. What was given a casual mention was the fourth E—energy—which I would consider to be one of the basic infrastructures to be given priority if the country were to progress beyond mediocrity. The other two are transportation and telecommunications.

She touted the passing of the EPIRA—the Electric Power Industry Reform Act of 2001—as a cornerstone on the path of reform, but forgot to point out that after nine years, the promised benefits of the energy liberalization has not taken hold: the target level of 70% of the power asset privatization has not been achieved, while the assigning of Independent Power Producers (IPP) administration has not really budged from first base.

These two requirements have stymied the real opening of a competitive power sector.

She also mentioned the passage of two landmark pieces of legislation on energy—the Biofuels Act of 2006 and the Renewable Energy Act of 2008—as part of her crowning glory, but the situation on the ground is not that impressive.

True, the mandated biodiesel content of 2% and an ethanol mix of 10% have been implemented, but there’s not much push to higher biodiesel or ethanol mix. No, the motorists should not be compelled to use them; but they should be educated on the advantages and limitations of these fuels mix.

The RE Act on the other hand, was passed on the philosophy that if you build it, they will come. No such torrent of new investments in renewable energy sources could be felt. Intentions are there, but laying down upfront cash is altogether different.

Part of the reason is that the implementing rules and regulations (IRR) of the Act has only come out very recently—almost a year since the bill was enacted into law. Even then, the detailed IRR of two of the most important provisions, those of the feed-in tariff and the renewable portfolio standards (RPS), are sorely lacking. Without these, investments in renewable energy resources, in particular, solar and wind could not be expected to take off.

Arroyo claimed that with these twin Acts, the populace should expect lower electricity bills soon. It is not clear however, how this would come about. On the contrary, without an attractive feed-in tariff and a well-defined RPS, investments in renewable energy would in fact jack up the prices of electricity.

Perhaps the lack of firm commitment or a report card on energy is a tacit acknowledgment that much is still needed to be done on this sector, if the country is to leapfrog forward and not just nonchalantly chug along.

Perhaps omission of the fourth “E” in the SONA was deliberate.