Lanao del Sur power cooperative is best argument against these dinosaurs

Unbelievable!

One could use more colourful superlatives to describe the Lanao del Sur (LASURECO) power cooperative, but it is not necessary. The bare facts are stranger than fiction. Consider these:

·         LASURECO has racked up debt of about P3.7-billion.

·         It was considered National Power Corporation’s (NPC ) most delinquent customer with outstanding debt at P2.28 billion as of June 2007 before it was put under management by NPC and the National Electrification Administration (NEA)

·         LASURECO’s systems losses had reached a staggering 63% before it was contained down to 30% by NPC and NEA, when the allowed losses for cooperatives should be only up to 14% which is already very generous

·         Its receivables collection rate had been a dismal 8%

·         It has not been paying its suppliers for years

·         It could not even pay its employees on time, if at all

·         It has failed to install an electrification project funded by NEA

The situation was so bad that NPC and NEA intervened in the cooperative’s operation in November 2007. Since then, its financial situation has improved a bit. At least it can now pay its current obligations to NPC, according to reports.

It has also started paying P1 million monthly for its P107 million it owes the National Electrification Administration (NEA). It should take the cooperative nine years to pay that obligation if there were no interests.

Well, at least NEA is getting some of its money back.

Before LASURECO came into our radar screens, we thought that the situation with the Albay Electric Cooperative (ALECO) was already the worst.

Save for a very few exceptions, electric cooperatives have not been performing well and are woefully managed.  Many of these dinosaurs have been in existence for long, and they should have been declared extinct eons ago.

Our policy makers should have a definite strategy to phase them out as the original business model for these creatures is no longer in tune with modern times.

One could start selling off the bigger of these power cooperatives and make them professionally managed corporations.

Why it is difficult to achieve, we can only guess.

Palawan power crisis once more highlights weakness of electric cooperatives

Palawan business leaders have been feeling the pinch of persistent and prolonged power brownouts in the province and the city of Puerto Princesa and warned the problem “could get worse” and could jeopardize efforts to make Palawan a major international tourist destination.

In the past few months, local business leaders have noted that the power interruptions have become longer and more frequent, and have become a major disincentive to business and tourism.

According to the National Power Corporation (NPC), there are some 40 megawatts (MW) of installed electrical capacity in the province while the peak demand reaches only 21 MW, so the problem could only lie within Palawan Electric Cooperative (Paleco), the local distribution unit. NPC is however silent on how much of the installed capacity is dependable, but it is unthinkable that half of it cannot be dispatched.

In many rural areas and island provinces, power supply has been a major complaint regarding basic necessities, and the common denominator of these areas is that power distribution is being handled by poorly managed, inefficient electric cooperatives. Electric cooperatives which have been given passing marks by their consumers are the exception.

Perhaps, it is about time to have a radical re-think about electric cooperatives. With no shareholders breathing on their necks, management of many of these cooperatives does not have real incentives to professionalize its operations. Oftentimes, management and members of the board are handpicked, or beholden to local officials, if not directly controlled.

There seems to be a lack of incentive to modernize the equipment, or at least maintain properly the existing ones. Customer service is farthest from the minds of these minnows pretending to be running a basic service provider.

Why is it that there is no concrete strategy to ultimately privatize these distribution units?

It used to be that these basic services (power distribution, telecommunications, and water) were thought to be a natural monopoly of the state, and therefore, should be run, or at least controlled by local government units. Not anymore, as shown by the telecommunication and water distribution—at least in major urban areas—industries.

Whenever there is clamor to privatize an electric cooperative, there seems to be a helluvah of opposition. But if you listen carefully above the din, the noise one seems to hear is that of local political interests who are likely to lose some perks and wealth once control is transferred to the private sector--not the consumers who silently groan under inefficient services and high rates.

Palawan is but a sorry example of our sordid, highly inefficient electricity distribution systems in many parts of the country.